What is the appropriate response to tragedies such as the one that occurred in
last Friday? Certainly, the best immediate response is to pray
for those whose loved ones were ripped away in a matter of minutes. And, of course, to be thankful that your
family is safe. But what can we do as a
society about these man-made tragedies, which seem to occur over and over again? One argument would be to strengthen gun
control. To me, that sounds like taking a
pill to treat the symptoms, instead of addressing the disease itself. Mass killings have happened throughout
history, long before handguns and semi-automatic rifles existed, or as
President Obama would say, back when men fought with “horses and
bayonets.” To be sure, knives and swords
have surely killed far more people than guns have. So we can’t really blame mass shootings on
the weapons themselves. To draw on a
tired cliché, guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Newtown,
So back to my earlier question. What can we do as a society about these tragedies? It’s not just the
shooting. It was the Aurora theater shooting back in July. Columbine 13 years before that. The NFL's Javon Belcher's murder-suicide earlier this month. Here in Birmingham,
a local restaurant owner recently took his mother’s life and then his own. Just last week in Birmingham, a federal courthouse employee committed
suicide in front of his coworkers. Over
the weekend, in separate incidents, several gunmen were killed by police, one
at a local hospital in Birmingham. A quick reading of the newspaper articles on
these events suggests that in nearly all of them, the shooter was suffering
from some level of mental disease or distress.
That’s not excusing the crimes.
All of the shooters likely knew what they were doing at the time. But whether you look at Dylan Klebold and
Eric Harris from Columbine High School 13 years ago, James Holmes from the Aurora movie theater massacre, Adam Lanza in the Newtown shooting, or any
of the murder-suicides or other recent shootings, there is a thread that seems
to connect them all. Extreme mental
distress or disease during the period of time leading up to the shooting. An argument can be made that strong
restraints on gun ownership could have prevented one or more of these
incidents. But an equally strong
argument can be made that each of these tragedies would have unfolded in the
exact same way. The sad truth is a
motivated killer will find a way to accomplish what he wishes.
In the wake of most of these tragedies, there has been a common theme: those acquainted with the killer either suspected serious mental issues or knew of the fact that the killer was, in fact, a ticking time bomb. It was the case at Columbine, it was the case in
Newtown, and, tragically, it will probably be
the case in the next shooting, unless we as a society are willing to take
responsibility for those around us.
Mothers and fathers need to be involved with their children and
understand what’s going on in their lives and in their heads. Wives need to be aware of changes in their
husband’s behavior, and husband’s their wives.
Coworkers need to be familiar enough with other coworkers so that
trouble can be spotted before it erupts. Actions must be taken by those family and friends. Warning signs can't be ignored or explained away. To this lawyer and writer, admittedly untrained in the ways of the mind,
this seems to be the only viable way to get to the actual disease that has
infected society for so long now. I know
the solution may not be as simple as I just stated, but it can’t be as simple
as taking guns away either.